How should articulable facts be evaluated in the context of suspicion?

Articulable facts should be evaluated in totality, meaning that all the facts should be considered together rather than in isolation or segmentally. This holistic approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the situation in question. In legal contexts, particularly with respect to issues of suspicion (such as in stops and searches), the totality of the circumstances principle acknowledges that individual facts might not be sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion on their own, but when combined with others, they can create a clearer picture that meets the required standard. This method aligns with legal precedents, ensuring that the assessment reflects the complexity of real-world situations rather than oversimplifying them by examining each fact alone.