What are the potential outcomes that immigration judges can decide on during a hearing?

During an immigration hearing, judges have a range of decisions they can make, with notable options including relief from removal and change of venue. The concept of relief in immigration proceedings refers to the various forms of relief from deportation that can be granted, such as cancellation of removal, adjustment of status, or asylum. This aspect is critical, as immigration judges assess the merits of individual cases and can provide protections to eligible individuals facing removal.

Additionally, change of venue is an important procedural aspect that can come into play if a case might be better considered in a different jurisdiction for various reasons, which an immigration judge has the authority to decide. This allows for flexibility in the handling of cases based on circumstances such as convenience for the parties involved or the relevance of evidence presented.

The other options, while relevant to immigration law, do not accurately reflect the specific decisions an immigration judge makes during hearings. Bond and change of address relate to preliminary matters rather than the core outcomes of removal proceedings. Removability concerns are addressed in the context of hearings, but naturalization is handled by different authorities. Lastly, while refugee status and asylum applications are critical immigration issues, they represent aspects of immigration law rather than formal outcomes that judges specifically decide upon during hearings.