What is required when performing an investigative detention based on reasonable suspicion?

When performing an investigative detention based on reasonable suspicion, the requirement to exercise due diligence and utilize the least intrusive means is essential. This reflects the balance that law enforcement must strike between the need to investigate potential criminal activity and the individual’s rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Reasonable suspicion allows law enforcement officers to stop and briefly detain a person to ask questions and investigate further if they believe that criminal activity may be afoot. However, the nature of this stop should not escalate to a full arrest unless there is probable cause. By choosing the least intrusive means, officers limit the duration and intensity of the detention, which helps to uphold constitutional protections while still allowing them to perform their investigative duties. This means that officers should be cautious not to use excessive force or overly invasive tactics during the detention.

The other options do not align with the principles governing investigative detentions. Immediate arrest without questioning would exceed the scope of a reasonable suspicion and elevate the situation unduly. Notifying the person of their rights is typically mandated during a custodial interrogation, which is not the same as an initial investigative detention. Gathering more evidence before acting might delay the investigative process unnecessarily, as reasonable suspicion alone is sufficient to initiate a brief detention for questioning.