What is the concept of "fruits of the poisonous tree" related to?

The concept of "fruits of the poisonous tree" refers to the legal principle that evidence obtained as a result of a violation of a defendant's constitutional rights is tainted and, therefore, inadmissible in court. This principle extends to any further evidence that is derived from the initially obtained tainted evidence, making it "poisoned" as well.

The rationale behind this doctrine is to deter law enforcement from conducting illegal searches or obtaining evidence in violation of constitutional protections, such as the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. If the initial evidence is considered "poisonous" due to being acquired unlawfully, any subsequent evidence that is derived from that original evidence is also deemed inadmissible. This ensures that the judicial process remains fair and upholds constitutional protections.

Therefore, the correct option highlights the relationship between the original violation and any subsequent evidence that stems from it, encapsulating the essence of the "fruits of the poisonous tree" doctrine.