Which scenario exemplifies a temporary seizure based on zero suspicion?

In this context, a temporary seizure based on zero suspicion refers to a situation where individuals are detained without any particular cause or reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Executing a criminal search warrant typically entails a suspected connection to criminal activity, and although it may involve temporarily seizing individuals present at the location, it is not characterized as being based on zero suspicion since the warrant itself is predicated on probable cause.

The most fitting scenario for a temporary seizure without any suspicion is questioning someone without any suspicion. This aligns with the definition, as it indicates there is no prior indication of wrongdoing before the engagement.

Therefore, it’s essential to understand that the key aspect of a seizure based on zero suspicion revolves around the absence of any concrete or reasonable grounds for the action taken against the individual involved. In cases involving the execution of warrants or questioning people with established suspicions, the threshold of suspicion has been crossed, which does not align with the premise of a seizure arising purely from zero suspicion.